We should be grateful to Labor, Bill Shorten and Chris Bowen for one thing at least. They have switched the Canberra vaudeville to off at least for a few days and taken the nation to a place where we can once again discuss the relative merits and deficits of government and opposition rather than standing aghast at the tawdry comings and goings in the nation’s capital.
Indeed, it was such an abrupt departure from the freak show that one cartoonist, musing on the difficulties of drawing a cartoon on the humour free zone of franking credits yesterday, took to social media to implore Barnaby Joyce to “do something.”
Let’s start with what Shorten’s announcement isn’t. It isn’t taxation reform in any substantial way. The Australian taxation system is and will continue to be unnecessarily complex and complicated, an ongoing garden party for accountants and lawyers but dismally incomprehensible to almost every other Australian.
A week or so ago I joked that Shorten’s media advisers should instruct him to have a long lie in, go into the office late, take the rest of the day off and continue to do so until the next election. Cynically, this is perhaps Shorten’s best pathway to the Lodge.
Before the last election, Labor determined to get a lot of policy into the public domain and while they fell short of forming government, the view is the party’s strategy was the right one. After the 2013 landslide win for the Coalition, Labor’s policy rollout in 2016 put them within one seat of forming minority government.
The Shorten tax proposal is more of the same with an eye to the next federal election.
As Adam Creighton observed in today’s Australian, “Australia’s tax system is shockingly tilted in favour of older, wealthier people, with little justification. Without a proper overhaul, in an era of stagnant wage growth and elevated house prices, that only fuels resentment.”
Labor’s proposals mine that resentment deep and hard. The government’s rhetoric then and now of a Shorten-Labor faux class war does not paint even half the picture. The old resentments between haves and have nots certainly exist and are palpable in the electorate but they find deeper expression across generational divides, among those who despair about housing affordability in the major capital cities with inflation stalking tepid wage growth.
Put succinctly, if by soulless marketing demographics, Shorten’s approach pits Baby Boomers v the rest — the Millennials, the Gen X-ers, the Gen Y-ers and whatever other absurd monikers the marketing folk attach to people these days. Whatever, the iron laws of arithmetic tell us there are more of them than there are of the boomers and in politics, that is enough to win elections.
The take home message is that Labor believes self-funded retirees do not as a rule vote Labor and the political consequences are likely to be minimal. Little downside, lots of upside is the prevailing view within the party at this point in the political cycle.
Labor’s proposal pushes the government further into a corner. Malcolm Turnbull knows he cannot get his company tax cuts through the Senate and has gone to a Plan B of personal income tax cuts but these will come at the expense of adding to the budget deficit and with it, the government’s claims of superior economic stewardship become sorely tested. Ongoing personal tax cuts of any impressive magnitude are almost impossible to fund without wholesale tax reform. The government will be left to tinker at the edges, leaving a benefit to average wage-earning folk of the packet of Chicken Twisties and can of diet Coke variety.
Bear in mind, the 2018-19 Budget will almost certainly be the Turnbull government’s last before the next election. A half Senate election is due no later than 19 May, 2019 (the Reps by 2 November, 2019) and one very much doubts the Turnbull government would create a circumstance where the punters would be obliged to trudge off to the polls twice in one year. Just as likely is a federal election in the latter part of this year.
To paraphrase Black Adder, Bill Shorten has “a plan so cunning you could put a tail on it and call it a weasel.” And without wanting to press the Vaudeville activation button, that weasel is Chris Bowen. Bowen is cast from the NSW right, an economic policy wonk and Keating acolyte. While he is invariably across his brief, it is his skills as a salesman that often fall short.
The reforms-that-aren’t approach is bold, and boldness or courage is not always rewarded in politics as it often veers into callow stupidity when the numbers are scrutinised and fall short or the government of the day spends each and every day picking the policy off to the point where an opposition is left befuddled and paralysed with embarrassment.
But if Chris Bowen can pull it off, Labor has just taken a step closer to forming the next government.
On commentators from days of yore, we have sadly been denied Darren of Brentford’s expert analysis on Shorten’s cunning stunt. What that man didn’t know about tax avoidance wasn’t worth knowing. I wouldn’t be surprised if he was hiding Putin’s riches as we speak.
Had brekky with a friend a while back who used to stash money–legally–for a major British bank. Nowadays the number of places left to hide money is vastly decreased. Hell, because of FATCA I can’t even open a new bank account without the US government being notified. Strangely, I could hide it in the US easier than outside.
Unless I win Powerball, that won’t be an issue.
FATCAT?
Greens going the way of the Democrats.They are hopeless without the Tasmanian Dr as their leader Bald.
Agree Bassy.
I was wondering today if Nick McKim might have his eye on the leadership. Take it back to Tasmania
There you have it the NEG appears to be designed to be worse than doing nothing. The cons are a disgrace. We know why those with no knowledge of the sector support it because it is ideologically driven to support the existing Fossil fuel cartels.
http://reneweconomy.com.au/new-analysis-shows-neg-is-worse-than-doing-nothing-34458/
New SA Premier Marshall, (Pyne’s puppet.) says renewables push up prices. Even though all data and research proves this incorrect. “But he also said the interconnector will allow for the “excess renewables” from South Australia to be exported to other states, “lowering prices across the entire nation” this bloke is about to be sworn in and his first interview is just the same ridiculous garbles rubbish he has been spouting for 5 years. The SA government is now nothing more than an extension of the worst federal government in Australia’s history. Marshall already looks like damaging the countries only manufacturer of Solar panels with his not previously announced plans. Disgraceful.
Am I detecting a little hostility towards your newly elected SA Premier Marshall dear Dismayed? He was only sworn in this morning so perhaps we should give him a go first to see what he does. Amanda Vandstone described him as having “balls of steel” on ABC TV this arvo. Cheers
Libs are just ridiculous. “Marshall also plans a new interconnector to NSW. Cost? Business plan ? No. ” But appears to ignore the fact that NSW is already the state with the highest dependence on imports, even more than South Australia and may not been a position to export power to anyone.” this is what happens when media is so concentrated in a small market that the public only get lies from one news outlet.
Straight out of the blocks the SA libs will kill off cheap power for the poorest in the community by stopping the world’s biggest “virtual power plant” that would install batteries in low income households for no cost. They are also now saying thy will stop Private enterprise offering low cost loans in favour of their taxpayer subsidy ideas? “So much for free markets. But it also raises the issue of sovereign risk.”
This is what happens when dishonest conservative get elected. No surprises.
http://reneweconomy.com.au/marshalls-first-promise-as-sa-premier-kill-tesla-battery-plan-68601/
” …… install batteries in low income households for no cost.” ??
There’s no such thing as a free lunch, and that also extends batteries.
that’s all you got? Negativity for the sake of it because your refuse to avail yourself of the knowledge required to understand. No cost up front Solar and batteries to the poorest households would have reduced their power bills by over 30%. the power created by the virtual power plant ( the households) would have added further security to the NEM grid and further reduced prices by adding competition in a state with very little competition due to the AEMO rules supporting the incumbent fossil fuel Gentailers. those companies that generate, transmit and retail the power. Usual poor effort carl.
Dismayed, I see you’ve now changed the goal posts to “no cost up front …… ” That obviously implies there will be a cost at some stage. So my 1.57pm comment about no freebies was correct after all. I’m not suggesting that your initial comment re this was deliberately ambiguous because you were probably unaware of it anyway. I’m not going to be smug about, everyone makes mistakes. The important test is how one gracefully admits it.
Australian Hotels Association blatantly lie about job losses if pokies are cut back. Note the AHA strongly supported the liberals with huge donations and false and misleading advertising campaigns and the Liberals supported the AHA. No surprises.
https://theconversation.com/factcheck-would-pokies-reform-in-south-australia-wipe-out-many-of-26-000-jobs-93189
The most exciting moment in my life was when Neil and Buzz walked on the moon in 1969.
Hello JB.
Britain’s breeding Turtledove population has declined by an alarming 91% in the last 10 years
Shorten crowing like a Rooster after the Batman win, Mr Insider. He may well do to remember that one Swallow does not make a Summer and he had the benefit of the shambolic Greens to thank for that win imho.
Speaking of headlines to note…..
The digital version of the OZ has a podcast from Patricia Karvelas with an interesting attention grabber. I wondered if it was a typo for a short moment……….. ‘The Biggest Crock I’ve Seen’