Humble servant of the Nation

Surviving the plastic bag donnybrook

SHARE
, / 10485 304

This week the nation has witnessed distressing images of forlorn supermarket shoppers breaking down and weeping at self-serve check-outs.

Teary shoppers had forgotten or perhaps they had remembered and should have forgotten. It’s hard to say. We can’t be sure anymore. On Wednesday, Coles lifted their ban on single use plastic bags and within 24 hours restored it.

Where it could lead today is anybody’s guess. Perhaps we’ll be asked to roll barrels to the shops, leading to a brief boon for struggling coopers before the supermarkets change their minds again.

Just yesterday I observed a shopper decline the offer of free plastic bags to pack what looked like the proceeds of a shopping list for the looming apocalypse.

The woman piled her fare bagless into her trolley, leaving it loaded to the gunwales to the point where a major industrial accident was in the offing. She weaved her trolley crazily from the check-out to the car park. As it transpired the journey was the easy bit. She hurled her goods into the back of her SUV, one by one, only to see many of them roll out and crash to the floor.

It was like watching a bad juggler in action. There was milk, eggs, Tim Tams, Dettol, toothpaste, talcum powder and something called Primal Strips Vegan Jerky hitting the deck. Ironically, the paper towel stoically remained in the back of the car.

I was going to offer my assistance, but the shopper had that look of a person who, once her shopping was secured, would commence scanning the horizon for the nearest clock tower, so I thought it politic to leave her be.

Why Coles executives changed their minds and then changed them again is anybody’s guess.

I do have one theory. Perhaps Coles had engaged in a marketing exercise of the 1985 New Coke variety. The marketing brouhaha never made it to our shores, but it involved placing a new version of Coke on the market with the threat, old Coke, the one consumers had enjoyed for nearly a century, would be phased out.

I was in the US at the time and virtually anywhere I went resonated to the sound of people sampling Coca-Cola’s New Coke. Almost invariably consumers were left grimacing and gasping as though they’d stood in line for their beverages at Jonestown.

For a couple of months, Coca-Cola’s share price veered up and down and around and around. Executives were in a state of panic. Some went to rehab. Others took the company pistol and were never seen again. Finally, the company acknowledged what pretty much everyone else already knew. New Coke tasted like a sugary form of strychnine. It was never going to fly.

New Coke got old and old Coke was new again.

The decision to drop New Coke was said to be an embarrassing backflip for the Atlanta-based soft drink giant. While it has never been openly acknowledged, Coca-Cola had engaged in an elaborate stunt. When the dust settled, and soft drink order was restored, Coca Cola had increased its market share. Take that, Pepsi.

Was Coles’ marketing gymnastics serendipitous or calculated? Remember, one man’s gibbering paranoia is another’s heightened state of awareness. What we can safely say is, in the marketing world the Wildian rule applies: “There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about.”

I have genuinely enjoyed the single-use plastic bag donnybrook in recent weeks. It is testament to this nation’s can-do-but-probably-won’t-and-besides-there’s-something-good-on-the-telly-so-can-you-please-go-away attitude.

It’s difficult to avoid the notion that we are being played New Coke style. Prior to the bans, I was in the habit of finding a second application for single-use plastic bags, namely inserting them in the kitchen tidy as bin liners.

Now I know I probably couldn’t get a patent up on this invention. I think one or two Australians might have thought of it first. And like me, these people no doubt have found they now have to buy actual bin liners and use them at approximately the same rate. I doubt what’s happening here is reducing the petrochemical-intense plastics manufacturing process or even saving ocean fauna to the point where we could end up hip-deep in turtles at some vague point in the future. But what do I know? I’m just a consumer.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the argument, one amusing proposition is that reusing plastic or cloth bags at the check-out could lead to a mass outbreak of some disgusting disease. Hepatitis. Malaria. Hook worm parasites. Necrosis and buboes. Bring out your dead. I’m not so worried about encephalitis. To be honest, I could do with a lie down.

Have these people ever been out the back of a supermarket? The ones I’ve seen are filth-encrusted disgraces. Bacteria the size of small cars. A clumsy storeman could drop a couple of hundredweight of Roma tomatoes on the deck. The five second rule not only applies, it’s been stretched to a neat two hours.

Give those toms a wash before you pop them on a sandwich and they’ll come up trumps.

Of course, it’s entirely possible Australians don’t like being told what to do and where the forgetful or the intransigent are concerned, they must endure a levy on their goods just so the supermarkets can pretend they care.

Banning unpleasant things is plain dumb. It sets an ugly totalitarian tone for governments and corporations alike. Government responsibility should begin and end at giving people genuine fact-based information and then sitting back and allowing them to make informed choices.

After that we’ll let governments know when we need them. Don’t call us et cetera etc.

This article was first ;published in The Australian on 3 August 2018

304 Comments

  • Dismayed says:

    Very good article on the hypocrisy of this government. “We have a long history of seeing the farmer as the entity to be protected and the unemployed person as the entity to be vilified.”
    What is the difference between an urban/rural worker (say) who loses his/her income because their job (productive activity) vanishes and a farmer who loses his/her income because their job (productive activity) vanishes as a result of changing global or national economic circumstances?
    Why is one job loser able to access crisis relief (which is generous) and the other job loser is only able to access unemployment benefits which now provide below-poverty line income support in Australia?
    Why is an unemployed worker not able to access concessional loans on their property to help them through the crisis, when clearly their plight is beyond their control?
    http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=40015#more-40015

    • Razor says:

      Because the unemployed don’t produce food. Google food security. It’s a long term thing but I’d suggest you wouldn’t understand the strategic concept. Your external locus of control doesn’t allow it.

    • Jean Baptiste says:

      Tops Dismayed. I suspect it has a bit to do with voting demographics?

    • Carl on the Coast says:

      Dismayed says:
      August 2, 2018 at 10:58 AM
      “cotc since the inception of this blog you have continually claimed worker exploitation does not exist”

      I say Dismayed, I’m still waiting for you to provide a specific comment where I have made such a claim.

      Cat got your tongue mate?

  • Carl on the Coast says:

    And now a Vic Government minister has gone off the rails and caught the banning craze, There should be an official veto against such actions.

  • Milton says:

    “We acknowledge the traditional custodians of this land, the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation. The University of Sydney – where we write, publish and distribute Honi Soit – is on the sovereign land of these people. As students and journalists, we recognise our complicity in the ongoing colonisation of Indigenous land. In recognition of our privilege, we vow to not only include, but to prioritise and centre the experiences of Indigenous people, and to be reflective when we fail to be a counterpoint to the racism that plagues the mainstream media.”

    This, obviously, on the main page of Honi Soit. What symbolic, self-absolving, condescending fluff.

    • Jean Baptiste says:

      Hardly self absolving is it? Hardly symbolic Positive action to attempt to remedy past wrongs.
      Full points though for your magical thinking.

      • Milton says:

        Balls, and you know it, Jean.

      • Carl on the Coast says:

        Money is obviously not the answer JB, eh.
        https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary…/IndigenousExpend

        Take your time and have a squiz me old mate.

        • Jean Baptiste says:

          And Carl knows the answer? Keep spending till justice is served and the problems are solved.
          You begrudge that do you?

      • Milton says:

        Jean – they are saying, we at Honi Soit are complicit in the colonisation of indigenous land and we consider that a privilege. Enjoying this privilege the people at Honi Soit intend to “vow to not only include, but to prioritise and centre the experiences of Indigenous people”, whatever that means, but if it is not discrimination, or racist, then i don’t know what is. Failing that they will reflect!
        I think the time to reflect would have been before they pressed the enter button after typing up that piece of cringeworthy crap.

  • BASSMAN says:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jov_s5IDbxg
    Off topic but worth it.What an AMAZING a key change at 2:40 with the most
    incredible vocal gymnastics one could ever witness.
    I am not a fan but she has the pipes of the world
    and nails dis song. She does Your the Voice with Farnham as well
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bu-Ff9Ka6w

  • Lou oTOD says:

    Well nothing to see in Victoria with young people of African appearance breaking the law eh?

    Now that is a riot.

  • Carl on the Coast says:

    Yes, I noted the online report in today’s Oz about a few dozen lads of “African appearance” down Vic way assembled (yet again) after dark at Taylors Hill to apparently test their level of testosterone against the hormones of the local constabulary. I thought it was quite clever that the thin blue line executed a deliberate tactic to gain more defensible ground, consolidate forces, encircle the enemy and lead them into an ambush without a shot being fired, despite aggressive provocation and damage to police property.

    Such a tactic can no doubt change the destiny of an entire police force, indeed an entire government, and thereby positively contribute to the survival and growth of our multi cultural communities.

  • Dismayed says:

    the dishonesty of the far right whingers knows no bounds. Their inability to comprehend the written word is also quit amazing. the NEG modelling shows NO investment in ANY, read that again, NO investment in ANY large scale power generation. The only investment will be small scale solar behind the meter on homes and business. The NEG has been designed to lock in the existing structure for Fossil fuels. I see the same ridiculous remarks on here from the same ridiculous troglodytes year after year. Take everything about the environment or the health effects of the current power generation structure out of the equation and ask, should we use New cheaper cleaner technology or continue to use 19th century technology. Or to make it even simpler for the far right trogs. Do you go to a Dr with the latest information and technology or stick to the old lady down the road who reads your tea leaves. The Baby Boomer Generation are the most selfish and wilfully ignorant to ever walk this earth. No Surprises.

    • Carl on the Coast says:

      I say Dismayed, your ” ….. Dr with the latest information and technology ….” analogy is not a sound one. There have been many ‘latest technologies’ offered by the medical profession that were touted as being able to cure/fix/eliminate, etc various illnesses and ailments but they have failed tragically and miserably for many patients. There is a recorded history of bad science with fatal mistakes. Thalidomide, silicon breast implants, pelvic floor reconstructions to name just a few.

      Talk about “willfully ignorant”, sheesh! Methinks you may have been reading too many tea leaves yourself, mate.

    • Bella says:

      Dinosaurs the lot. 😑

  • Tracy says:

    Reminder that the EPL kicks off Saturday am our time.
    Tips in for those who have yet to do so https://www.footytips.com.au/comps/Insiders_EPL

  • Carl on the Coast says:

    I wonder if the investigation will be shortened and the report now end up in one of those single use plastic bags.

  • JackSprat says:

    Why do banks offer less interest rates on Super Fund term deposits than on “private” deposits?

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

PASSWORD RESET

LOG IN