We should be grateful to Labor, Bill Shorten and Chris Bowen for one thing at least. They have switched the Canberra vaudeville to off at least for a few days and taken the nation to a place where we can once again discuss the relative merits and deficits of government and opposition rather than standing aghast at the tawdry comings and goings in the nation’s capital.
Indeed, it was such an abrupt departure from the freak show that one cartoonist, musing on the difficulties of drawing a cartoon on the humour free zone of franking credits yesterday, took to social media to implore Barnaby Joyce to “do something.”
Let’s start with what Shorten’s announcement isn’t. It isn’t taxation reform in any substantial way. The Australian taxation system is and will continue to be unnecessarily complex and complicated, an ongoing garden party for accountants and lawyers but dismally incomprehensible to almost every other Australian.
A week or so ago I joked that Shorten’s media advisers should instruct him to have a long lie in, go into the office late, take the rest of the day off and continue to do so until the next election. Cynically, this is perhaps Shorten’s best pathway to the Lodge.
Before the last election, Labor determined to get a lot of policy into the public domain and while they fell short of forming government, the view is the party’s strategy was the right one. After the 2013 landslide win for the Coalition, Labor’s policy rollout in 2016 put them within one seat of forming minority government.
The Shorten tax proposal is more of the same with an eye to the next federal election.
As Adam Creighton observed in today’s Australian, “Australia’s tax system is shockingly tilted in favour of older, wealthier people, with little justification. Without a proper overhaul, in an era of stagnant wage growth and elevated house prices, that only fuels resentment.”
Labor’s proposals mine that resentment deep and hard. The government’s rhetoric then and now of a Shorten-Labor faux class war does not paint even half the picture. The old resentments between haves and have nots certainly exist and are palpable in the electorate but they find deeper expression across generational divides, among those who despair about housing affordability in the major capital cities with inflation stalking tepid wage growth.
Put succinctly, if by soulless marketing demographics, Shorten’s approach pits Baby Boomers v the rest — the Millennials, the Gen X-ers, the Gen Y-ers and whatever other absurd monikers the marketing folk attach to people these days. Whatever, the iron laws of arithmetic tell us there are more of them than there are of the boomers and in politics, that is enough to win elections.
The take home message is that Labor believes self-funded retirees do not as a rule vote Labor and the political consequences are likely to be minimal. Little downside, lots of upside is the prevailing view within the party at this point in the political cycle.
Labor’s proposal pushes the government further into a corner. Malcolm Turnbull knows he cannot get his company tax cuts through the Senate and has gone to a Plan B of personal income tax cuts but these will come at the expense of adding to the budget deficit and with it, the government’s claims of superior economic stewardship become sorely tested. Ongoing personal tax cuts of any impressive magnitude are almost impossible to fund without wholesale tax reform. The government will be left to tinker at the edges, leaving a benefit to average wage-earning folk of the packet of Chicken Twisties and can of diet Coke variety.
Bear in mind, the 2018-19 Budget will almost certainly be the Turnbull government’s last before the next election. A half Senate election is due no later than 19 May, 2019 (the Reps by 2 November, 2019) and one very much doubts the Turnbull government would create a circumstance where the punters would be obliged to trudge off to the polls twice in one year. Just as likely is a federal election in the latter part of this year.
To paraphrase Black Adder, Bill Shorten has “a plan so cunning you could put a tail on it and call it a weasel.” And without wanting to press the Vaudeville activation button, that weasel is Chris Bowen. Bowen is cast from the NSW right, an economic policy wonk and Keating acolyte. While he is invariably across his brief, it is his skills as a salesman that often fall short.
The reforms-that-aren’t approach is bold, and boldness or courage is not always rewarded in politics as it often veers into callow stupidity when the numbers are scrutinised and fall short or the government of the day spends each and every day picking the policy off to the point where an opposition is left befuddled and paralysed with embarrassment.
But if Chris Bowen can pull it off, Labor has just taken a step closer to forming the next government.
Penny says::March 15, 2018 at 7:48 pm
”Using wood to heat your house is not exactly wise Boa. Countless studies have been done as to how much it affects the environment…..I love a wood fire too, but if you look at Launceston as one example it was proven that not only do wood fires create pollution, but the amount of wood needed just to heat one household was absolutely unsustainable”
I don’t heat my whole house with wood. Just the lounge with the door closed.
One and a half tonnes logs at a cost of $150 for the Winter will do me just fine thanks – far preferable to a miserable soulless heater which would probably be in the region of $400-500 or more, for the winter. Dunno, never tried it.
The logs are a renewable resource cut off a friend’s property – he has thousands of trees. we don’t cut and burn old growth forests for firewood.
I can assure you that sitting in front of a fire, with a glass of red, thinking of a brisk walk in the snow on the mountain next day is blissful. It’s a way of life here in old-fashioned backward Tassie. Driving through the countryside in Winter you’ll see lots of charming little cottages and pubs with the chimney puffing out a comforting plume of smoke. Also up at the Winter lodges.
They are doing burnoffs on the mountains at the moment. One of their burnoffs would probably produce as much smoke as cottage fires do for the whole of Winter. Hobart is on the coast – we have prevailing winds that blow it all to NZ.
A glass of red wine…….only one?
When we are traveling around Australia Tracy, we often light a fire in the campsite (safely of course) and find that one glass or red just doesn’t cut it….sometimes not even two
Had a rather nice Pinot Noir tonight Penny, reckon wine bottles are smaller than they used to be or it’s evaporation as soon as you take the cap off.
You should try my brothers Pinot Noir Tracy, it’s a beautiful drop. He made a special edition in 2011 after my mother passed away. It was her birthday yesterday (she would have been 102) so the family all opened their bottles (separately of course) and celebrated her life.
I’ve no time for drunks, Penny! [ and yes, you too, Tracy].
That’s what I’m owning up to Tracy! 😊
OK Boa, that’s fair…I guess. As I said I love an open fire….but you can’t do anything these days without riling the environmentalists.
One of the (few) things I miss about Wisconsin winters. A big stone fireplace.
Indeed Dwight. I love it. Winter is a special time.
An “open fire ” in the lounge room during winter in the Southern Highlands of NSW remains a fond memory of mine Boa. But there can be some health issues if appropriate ventilation, etc measures are not taken.
Regarding bushfires and burnoffs (as distinct from wildfires in and around populated areas), those who now study “vegetation dynamics” confirm that ‘controlled burning’ has a positive effect on the environment. But then, our first nations people knew that 60,000 years ago, eh.
Gotta agree Boa. Love a wood fire. Also love the smell of the woodsmoke in a country town in winter.
Our previous house had an enclosed fireplace in the lounge room and an old Rayburn cooker in the kitchen. I miss them both, and plan to install a stove in our new/old digs. There is nothing on a cold night that connects us to our past as a fire. And the same could be said for a hot night.
As for me: I love a rainy night, I love a rainy night…..
Get a gas log look fire. Much more efficient, less expensive and much better for air quality. Seriously many you just cant stop living the past,
How about NO……
Can’t get one in a campsite Dismayed….😶
My lounge neither….
Carpe diem! I live in the present.
The past, you mention Howard/Costello in every second post.
I can’t see any benefit in Turnbull and Bishop adding their 5cents worth on the Russian/England matter.
Trump’s culling of staff is something to behold. I wouldn’t recommend his employees to get out a loan.
OT, when we have state elections and a party gets up that is different to the govt, do we note that voters differentiate between state and federal politics? Would that also be the case with the recent democrat in the US, or was that not simply a state matter?
No jobs for “life” in the Trump Administration Milton. H R McMaster and Jeff Sessions definitely earmarked to go to the “retirement paddock” do feel. Keeps everyone on their toes. Cheers
Depends. In the US there is clear preference by voters to not have one party government in Washington. But, on average, 90% of Congress gets re-elected.
There is very little carryover from the national to the state level. Voters just do not, as a whole, care about national issues when voting for state offices, and vice versa.
Also – that was I 2 comments down with no ability to edit somehow came out as being written by the first numeral….apologies for confusion…if indeed such occurred.
ol mate ain’t happy
https://twitter.com/MRobertsQLD/status/974865851475099648
BTW whoever came up with headline deserves credit for the putative Spoonerism ” cunning stunt” or ” stunning…” which I am sure has not gone unnoticed among the cognoscenti (and I cannot help but wonder how many inadvertently read it that way!!!)
Sorry for the drop in tone (and levity of course) but in the absence of the 2 old men from Qld (of whom nothing has been hear for a long time)….
Burke & Hare?
I always thought it was one young bloke having a laugh.
I’m confident it was one person, Carl that I thought was a mid 2’s uni student but Trivalve suggest he was older and now deceased. A worthy JtI Hall of Famer!
Think heart surgery was implied for B & H at one point and not much was heard after that and Plmo is another gentleman who has not been around
I think that plmo wrote a signing off post.
Nah , could have been that , Old Aged Pensioner , from way back 🙂
They had a liking for you, Bill. Often talking about getting a cab ride from you.
JTI,
1. tax is paid on the income at 30% by the company prior to distribution of dividends;
2. the owners of the company are the shareholders (recipients of any dividend) , so they HAVE paid the tax;
3. double taxation was recognised as wrong by both parties when they created imputation and then both Labr and Liberals lauded the rebate including cash (as opposed to a mere tax credit)
4. Superannuation is designed to provide for retirement (and avoid the aged pension) and certainty is important : people make decisions for investment based on the rules in place. To arbitrarily change the rules (by either side simply because they see a pot of money) debases the system.
5. I am not affected directly by the inability to take cash refunds (but shares in Super funds, shares generally will be and the only result will be to push more funds into property…)
6. The interesting feature is the groups which could still obtain cash refunds from the ATO under Shorten’s scheme – groups that do not pay tax including churches, charities and unions!!!!!
7. Will the Liberals grow cojones sufficient to denounce that – and take them on ,,,don’t hold your breath.
The continuing claims from peopel who wilfully misunderstand capital gains tax and describe the tax on ” only 50% profits ” as a ” discount” reflects poorly on understanding: you need to maintain capital at its real rate & THE CONCEPT OF HISTORICAL COST PLUS cpi A S THE BASE WA SRELATIVELY REASONABLE WHEN IT WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1985. Widespread appaling record keeping and teh difficulty in calculating led to simplification of the rule that instead of indexing the base the tax would be paid on 50% of the gain (assuming it qualified as capital as opposed to income, simplifying the provisions again by generally stating that if held more than a year it was capital). Reversion to the old system of indexing the capital base in an era when every phone and person just about has spreadsheet capability, would not only be easy – it would raise more money as those who trade shares or properties relatively frequently but hold for just over a year would pay tax on a much higher proportion of the gain, while the intention of offering reasonable protection to those who hold longterm assets for extended periods would be preserved. My guess is that this simple restoration could raise far more tax (whether good or bad as governments in Oz spend like there is no tomorrow anyway) than the Shorten initiative while also being more equitable.
8. at the same time remove the tax exemptions for unions, employer groups , religions and ” charities” . If any such body wishes to claim a reduction or exemption it should require an annual proof of the specific moneys to be exempted from revenue as being used for a specified exempt purpose in the year with the burden of proof resting on the applicant
Let the screaming begin (and my apologies for the accidental fat-fingered use of capitals and the length of the post)
cheers
Well done 1.
By the way I think JTI had his bloggers’ minds all a bit startled with his column headline – given the chief subject! 😁
I reckon that’s a fair and accurate summation 1.
There are some on here who should put that in their pipe and smoke it; and bugger the environmental consequenses.
Well what a welcome sight you are from out of the blue…please do it again Bald!!
Twas I but the computer decided that putting things in numbered paragraphs was inappropriate for my soubriquet – hence approrpriated the first numeral….
Apologies….
guilty as sin……
I quite like the name 1. Voltaire, sounds sort of James Bondish…
Penny,
Aside from the free speech lines, Voltaire (later plagiarised by Oscar Wilde) : There is only one sin: vulgarity….
Also he was a survivor…
cheers
“You could basically just run through and change “America” for “Australia” in this and you’d be exactly right. A must read:”
https://tinyurl.com/ya3qmbwf
AYFKM? central bank gob dunno why risk ain’t priced….coz you gobs bail out failures ffs
http://www.afr.com/personal-finance/complacency-still-rules-financial-markets-20180316-h0xkjd?&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=nc&eid=socialn:twi-14omn0055-optim-nnn:nonpaid-27/06/2014-social_traffic-all-organicpost-nnn-afr-o&campaign_code=nocode&promote_channel=social_twitter
Am a huge fan of the witty left leaning TV Late Night Presenter, Stephen Colbert, Mr Insider. Also a massive fan as you know of POTUS Trump who is shaking the living daylights out of the US Economy bringing it back to life more and more every day. Colbert trashes Trump unmercifully but that in a Democracy is very healthy. Kim Jong un on the other hand feeds his detractors to wild dogs or has them blown up with mortars. I know which system I want to live under. Short clip here of Stephen’s on the Rex Tillerson firing, thank god he’s gone the old darling, and also hear H R McMaster is in the “Out Que” too!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sU7HzBOCKbI
Cyril Ramaphosa’s compulsory acquisition of farms owned by white south africans is a worrying development. The same move by Mugabe in Zimbabwe resulted in violence and turned a rich farming land into a dustbowl.
Yes I see potato has caused an international incident with his natural racism. But let me say before howard stopped bringing African refugees in after bringing many and not put them through health checks . It was my position Australia should bring over the Rhodesian farmers. Much nicer people than the Seth Efricaans. No surprises.
Comment like that reveals what an idiot you really are Dismayed.
Personal abuse Yvonne you have just proven why I would take Rhodesian over a Seth Efricaan every of the week. The Rhodesians at least have some sense of humour. You are either really short really (fake ) blonde or both. Everything seems to go straight over your head. No surprises.
Tall and brunette actually. So where does that leave me in your racial classification, Dismayed?
humourless.
You think your remarks above are humorous? Really?
Try and show some respect when addressing what is a serious issue for those about to lose everything without a single cent of compensation.
And by the way its “South Africans”. If you can’t handle personal abuse don’t dish it out on others constantly.
Its just not cricket!
NZ v Eng first test starts Wednesday, Aus v SA Thursday.
Dismayed, so let me get this straight, minister Dutton has an inbred skill/capacity to voice his concerns for South African farmers and you boast of having had a similar skill re the “Rhodesian” farmers.
Therefore, from a humanitarian aspect Dismayed = Dutton. Well done you.
Dutts is a baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad man Toaster.
A lot of Rhodesian farmers fled to South Africa when Mugabe’s thugs went through them all those years ago, Carl.
So when Dismal meets with Dutton to give his recommendations he might find himself a bit confused – because a fair few of the dispossessed South African farmers he clearly feels are unacceptable may have Rhodesian heritage.
I see Julie Bishop has not backed Dutton though….
That’ll count for nought Penny.
don’t defame me carl. you have an unparalleled ability to miscomprehend and obfuscate every single comment made. I am sure it has taken you decades to become so confused. very sad when people lose the ability to recognise all manner of things that were once easily recognised.
Dismayed says: “don’t defame me carl.”
Now steady on mate, I was only attempting to give you a genuine wrap, not to damage your fragile reputation.
And I’m still waiting for you to crack a smile. 😋
Really accusations that I am some sort of Pedo is it Razor? Because I dare to help young Australians stay healthy.. We also have had a good friend, one of Australian National Karate Coaches around twice a week for years taking sessions, are you going to suggest he is also some so of Pedo for training up to elite young athletes? You are a disgrace and again prove the sort of coward and scum you.
Zimbabwe all over again Boa. Just terrible.
Hope not, Razor. I was appalled when I read about it though. Doesn’t sound good – but maybe they have some civilised method in mind. Time will tell.
It seems that this youth activist Malema has a big influence over there, Razor. He is advocating ”take it from the whites, redistribute etc etc etc” It would be really sad to see SA go down that path. It is really unbelievable that will be no compensation – for God’s sake. But then again I guess most of the available funds are lining the pockets of corrupt polliticians and people llike the Guptas – not much left over to do the right thing and buy out the farmers if they must have the land. They will not farm it – it will turn to wastelsnd. I lived in Africa long enough to know that.
Inevitable Boa……..sorry.
I agree 100% it’s not good but there does seem like it could take a better path than it did in Zimbabwe where there was an actual dictator at the helm. Be alert but not alarmed I think.
Re the murders, well, it’s not just the farmers. They don’t have three-metre fences, razor wire and (heavily) armed security callout there for nothing.
Well let’s hope Ramaphosa manages to keep a lid on it Triv. One can be certain though that Zuma and the Gupta’s weren’t the only one’s with their hands in the till.
Sad though that many of the farmers now in strife are having to upstakes for the second time.
That’s why we left Africa. It’s their country and we saw no point in staying. Best decision I ever made.
A lot different now to when I left Triv. We lived in Cape Town which was/is a little better than the rest of the country as regards race relations, crime etc.
Before the days of barbed wire fences – but every window in the house had burglar bars. Large unbarred windows unheard of – even back then