Humble servant of the Nation

Shorten’s cunning stunt

SHARE
, / 12911 575

We should be grateful to Labor, Bill Shorten and Chris Bowen for one thing at least. They have switched the Canberra vaudeville to off at least for a few days and taken the nation to a place where we can once again discuss the relative merits and deficits of government and opposition rather than standing aghast at the tawdry comings and goings in the nation’s capital.

Indeed, it was such an abrupt departure from the freak show that one cartoonist, musing on the difficulties of drawing a cartoon on the humour free zone of franking credits yesterday, took to social media to implore Barnaby Joyce to “do something.”

Let’s start with what Shorten’s announcement isn’t. It isn’t taxation reform in any substantial way. The Australian taxation system is and will continue to be unnecessarily complex and complicated, an ongoing garden party for accountants and lawyers but dismally incomprehensible to almost every other Australian.

A week or so ago I joked that Shorten’s media advisers should instruct him to have a long lie in, go into the office late, take the rest of the day off and continue to do so until the next election. Cynically, this is perhaps Shorten’s best pathway to the Lodge.

Before the last election, Labor determined to get a lot of policy into the public domain and while they fell short of forming government, the view is the party’s strategy was the right one. After the 2013 landslide win for the Coalition, Labor’s policy rollout in 2016 put them within one seat of forming minority government.

The Shorten tax proposal is more of the same with an eye to the next federal election.

As Adam Creighton observed in today’s Australian, “Australia’s tax system is shockingly tilted in favour of older, wealthier people, with little justification. Without a proper overhaul, in an era of stagnant wage growth and elevated house prices, that only fuels resentment.”

Labor’s proposals mine that resentment deep and hard. The government’s rhetoric then and now of a Shorten-Labor faux class war does not paint even half the picture. The old resentments between haves and have nots certainly exist and are palpable in the electorate but they find deeper expression across generational divides, among those who despair about housing affordability in the major capital cities with inflation stalking tepid wage growth.

Put succinctly, if by soulless marketing demographics, Shorten’s approach pits Baby Boomers v the rest — the Millennials, the Gen X-ers, the Gen Y-ers and whatever other absurd monikers the marketing folk attach to people these days. Whatever, the iron laws of arithmetic tell us there are more of them than there are of the boomers and in politics, that is enough to win elections.

The take home message is that Labor believes self-funded retirees do not as a rule vote Labor and the political consequences are likely to be minimal. Little downside, lots of upside is the prevailing view within the party at this point in the political cycle.

Labor’s proposal pushes the government further into a corner. Malcolm Turnbull knows he cannot get his company tax cuts through the Senate and has gone to a Plan B of personal income tax cuts but these will come at the expense of adding to the budget deficit and with it, the government’s claims of superior economic stewardship become sorely tested. Ongoing personal tax cuts of any impressive magnitude are almost impossible to fund without wholesale tax reform. The government will be left to tinker at the edges, leaving a benefit to average wage-earning folk of the packet of Chicken Twisties and can of diet Coke variety.

Bear in mind, the 2018-19 Budget will almost certainly be the Turnbull government’s last before the next election. A half Senate election is due no later than 19 May, 2019 (the Reps by 2 November, 2019) and one very much doubts the Turnbull government would create a circumstance where the punters would be obliged to trudge off to the polls twice in one year. Just as likely is a federal election in the latter part of this year.

To paraphrase Black Adder, Bill Shorten has “a plan so cunning you could put a tail on it and call it a weasel.” And without wanting to press the Vaudeville activation button, that weasel is Chris Bowen. Bowen is cast from the NSW right, an economic policy wonk and Keating acolyte. While he is invariably across his brief, it is his skills as a salesman that often fall short.

The reforms-that-aren’t approach is bold, and boldness or courage is not always rewarded in politics as it often veers into callow stupidity when the numbers are scrutinised and fall short or the government of the day spends each and every day picking the policy off to the point where an opposition is left befuddled and paralysed with embarrassment.

But if Chris Bowen can pull it off, Labor has just taken a step closer to forming the next government.

 This article was first published at The Australian on 14 March 2018

575 Comments

  • Henry Blofeld says:

    Elon Musk’s Tesla battery in South Australia’s Mid-North will no longer be the world’s most powerful, with a new, bigger battery being built at Port Augusta by the young business genius Sanjeev Gupta, who’s progress I have followed for a long time, Mr Insider. Musk and Gupta, the World needs more of these type of people, how lucky is SA to be getting their visionary expertise.
    https://tinyurl.com/y797tkpm

    • Dismayed says:

      Not lucky enough because after tomorrow SA will Have S. Marshall “if you want SA to grow vote Labor and only a strong Labor government can lead SA”. Will lead a rear view mirror looking Lib government. SA JAY has done a good job to get the state back in the game.

      • Henry Blofeld says:

        16 years of Labor a fair innings though Dismayed. May the best Team win . Cheers

        • Dismayed says:

          HB as predicted the SA Libs. picked up the 4 seats redistributed to them by the electoral commission. Sad day for SA and the growing world leading Energy sector. The Libs lead by C.Pyne will be nothing but an extension of the federal government which we know is the Worst government in this Nations history.

  • BASSMAN says:

    I have been saying for some time Shorten is hopeless and barking mad.Only a Drongo would announce a new tax before a goodbye election that was always going to be difficult to win anyway.The only thing I can think of is he is testing the water to measure the backlash to see if most of the people who are affected are Looter voters.This measure affects 250, 000 pensioners.The Liberals 2016 cuts to Super affected 370, 000….they did a deal with the Greenz. I am amazed this has not been raised.That said Labor and the Looters should keep their hands off our Super.Howards gift to the rich initially cost 500MILLION.It now costs 5billion a year ballooning out to $8billion a year down the track

    • Henry Blofeld says:

      You have indeed been telling us about Shorten BASSMAN and by the way it looks bang on too , he’s a wally of monumental proportions and god forbid may let Turnbull slip back into the Lodge again. Cheers

      • Carl on the Coast says:

        I say HB, if you are asking God to forbid Turnbull from slipping back into The Lodge, as you have indicated above, then you also appear to be inadvertantly saying its okay for the “wally of monumental proportions” Shorten to get the gig. I think you may be a tad confused HB, unless you think its okay for either of the “monumental wallys” to be PM.

        Please explain.

    • JackSprat says:

      Bassy,

      I would submit that, considering the budget deficits over the last 9 years, most , if not all, things are unfunded.

      We could look at parent contributory visas which, due to the age of the recipients, have been estimated to cost $60 billion over the lives of the recipients. We leave in 9000 a year and with a life expectancy of 20 years that amount to 180,000 people adding to the costs of the health system over time. ( A health system that is not equipped to check anyway.)

      We could look at Aboriginal welfare welfare which runs at well over $10 billion and of which about $1 gets to the people in need. At the same time we could look at the welfare to “tic-a-box” Aborigines. (Not my words but the words of a Tasmanian Aboriginal elder)

      We look look at health funding toe all people withe a BMI over 30. They are costing the health system a fortune. If you do not get your weight down, pay for your own medication.

      With 2.5 million people living in poverty, we could take a really close look at foreign aid,

      We could look very closely at the cost of the refugee program – short and long term.

      Nothing of the above will happen because they are the pet projects of the left leaning elites and some should be left alone.

      We could take a very close look at the GST re-distribution system. If NSW got its full share, it could reduce land tax which, in some places of Sydney, contributes a base cost of $120 a week to rent.

      Dismayed has stated that the “era of entitlements is over” – well lets start looking everywhere instead of just those who pay, or have paid, the majority of tax in this country because, if you tax them too much, they will just up and leave.

      Shorten has started a class warfare battle – it just shows how bereft he is of ideas.

      By the way, the problem with Shorten’s proposal is that he has given no time to adjust.
      The hidden agenda is to get rid of SMsf’s so much of that money will pour into the union controlled funds.
      The vested interests rule – whether they be on the Labor or Liberal side – and the poor bastard with no affiliations gets screwed.

      • JackSprat says:

        Sorry JTI – it did not look that long while I was writing it.

      • Tracy says:

        My super has been in a union fund for the last two years, earnings are way better than Virgin and prior to that AMP, one big difference is they aren’t gouging me in fees, Virgin wasn’t too bad but AMP was shocking, should have moved earlier.
        People should shop around and get the best deal for their personal requirements, same as health insurance.

        • JackSprat says:

          Wife is the same Tracy but there seems to be a few Union Funds that channel a lot of money back to the unions – or so the rumor goes.
          Labor hates the SMSF’s which control $700 billion. I think their reasoning might be that if it were in one big fund the money could be used for development purposes.
          The Libs hate the Union funds.
          The big funds see themselves missing out on 2% of $700 billion each year.
          Every man and his dog want a slice – the “Investment” advisers want around 2%; the accountants want their slice; the auditors want their slice and so it goes on and on. In the big funds, the money is split 3 ways – the employees with their often outrageous bonuses, the shareholders and coming in a sad last is the poor sod who puts the money up.
          When you have $2 trillion and associated fees, there are more pigs with their snouts in the trough than you can count.
          The worry is that the $2 trillion could become a fraction of that in the not too distant future if the world does not handle the transition away from a debt economy correctly.
          World debt is $233 trillion or 3 times the GDP of the world.

      • Dismayed says:

        NO JS. I said. “That’s because the “age of entitlement” isn’t over – the age of entitlement is 60-plus”

        • JackSprat says:

          Nope.

          The entitlement epidemic is pretty well everywhere at all age levels. One just has to look at the Welfare and health costs of this country to see it at work.You are only choosing to focus in on the over 60’s to suit the current political ends..

          Starting an inter-generational war and focusing on one group is not the answer – especially with so many people entering retirement. Most of the over 60’s I know worry about their grand kids and how to provide for them.

          Read an interesting article the other day “Democracy ceases to function when the number of people on the Government teat exceeds those providing the taxes”

          • Dismayed says:

            JS the only areas of welfare that are growing are the Pension and rightfully the NDIS. All other areas of welfare have been cut. The intergenerational war was started by Howard and Costello by shovelling all manner of tax rorts and concession to their own generation.

            • JackSprat says:

              So your argument goes along the lines – this bit of welfare is not growing so therefore there is no sense of entitlement — interesting logic there.

              Re Costello and tax rorts – That is the same argument used by Labor for years when they complained about Howard’s tax cuts – he promised them in an election, Rudd matched the promise, Rudd implemented them and then Labor labelled them Howard’s tax cuts.

              If there is no sense of entitlement arising from aspects of the NDIS then I would suggest that there has been a total change in human nature.

      • BASSMAN says:

        “Shorten has started a class warfare battle – it just shows how bereft he is of ideas”.

        One thing Stan is…..he is NOT short of is ideas. Labor has lead on policy development for the last 4yrs. So much so the Liberals have stolen most of them! The Looters are a policy vacuum STOP the BOATS, JOBSENGROWTH, END THE DEBT, THIS IS A BAAAAAAAAD GOVT….this was the extent of their “policies”!

    • Carl on the Coast says:

      BASSY says: “Only a Drongo would announce a new tax before a goodbye election …. ”

      If you’re saying stupidity, ineptitude and sneakiness trumps upfront honesty BASSY, then you have a warped sense of values.

  • Dismayed says:

    Reasonable summation. It is clear SA’s renewable leadership has lead to lower price increases than Qld, NSW and Vic. The pensioners are better off under Labor with more renewables. No Surprises.
    http://reneweconomy.com.au/five-myths-about-south-australias-renewable-energy-59004/

    • Carl on the Coast says:

      Re power prices, our independent unbiased ABC News is not shy about telling it how it is – “South Australia has the nation’s highest power prices …. perhaps the highest prices in the world.”

      Unlike others, who have ongoing difficulty facing facts.

      • Dismayed says:

        cotc SA doe NOT have the highest prices in the world. You are repeating known LIES. this makes you comment irrelevant as usual. You also prove again you don’t understand critical mass when it comes to markets.

  • Dismayed says:

    coalitions deception or smoke screen if you like continues. Worst government in Nations history.
    http://reneweconomy.com.au/emperor-no-clothes-neg-kill-investment-storage-77824/

    • JackSprat says:

      SA appears to have made itself the darling of the renewable industry around the world.
      It may fall on its feet.

  • Henry Blofeld says:

    Voters say Shorten “like a reed in the wind”, Mr Insider as already he faces backlash over his Super grab announcement. I posted below that this may be his way of testing this new idea of his given the weekend we have the SA State Election and the Batman By Election. Shorten is either a genius or as silly as a gunny sack full of three penny bits. The latter methinks.
    https://tinyurl.com/y7nq7ell

  • Milton says:

    As a drinker and smoker i’m disinclined, and not well [hic, cough] enough, to champion others hit by the guvmint.
    Is this country mature enough to have serious debates on matters that would lead to a better oz?

  • jack says:

    Fascinating news from the US, the former marine in Pennsylvania has just given the Dems a pathway to winning the mid-terms, be a social conservative, gun tolerant, pro-services, anti Pelosi, old fashioned Dem.

    a sort of Bill Clinton approach.

    who would have thought that could work.

    But will they do it?

    • Jack The Insider says:

      Distinctly and vocally anti-Pelosi, mate. Good candidate, good result. A 20 per cent plus swing in our terms on the 2016 result. There must be a sign for the Dems there somewhere.

      • Tracy says:

        Rick Saccone hasn’t conceded yet and some republicans are wanting a recount if the Washington Post is correct.

        • Jack The Insider says:

          Not sure of the state rules but he got so close I would imagine a recount is possible if not mandatory.

          • Tracy says:

            There is apparently no provision for an automatic recount and if they (republicans) want one they have to pay for it themselves along with enough signatures on a petition?
            I thought Tasmania was complicated but the varying rules in each US state is baffling at the best of times.

      • Dwight says:

        Saw Pelosi on TV and she was denying he was anti-her. I think she’s getting worried she’ll now never get the “big gavel” back.

  • BASSMAN says:

    The head of the Australian Border Farce has been sacked on the grounds he helped his girlfriend get a job within the organisation.
    He was on a salary of nearly $700,000 a year. When will Mad Barnaby Joyce be sacked from parliament for doing the same thing?

    • Boadicea says:

      Quite a smooth operator, Bassy!

    • jack says:

      personally i don’t think it is quite the same thing,

      Ministerial staff are not public servants in the same way that Departmental staff are, they are selected and appointed at the whim of the party employing them.

    • smoke says:

      thinking ol quadcopter mate had security clearance thingy with a responsibility not to fk up the way he did

  • BASSMAN says:

    What the Liberals have done (below) is MUCH more damaging to families than Shorten’s proposal…some of these nasties are still before the Senate and they are hoping to get them through when Senate numbers change because of the citizenship debacle.
    -The $600million cuts to Family Tax Benefits leaving someone on $65,000 a year $3,000 worse off!
    -Maternity leave cuts of $258million
    -$138 million from increasing co-payments and changing the safety net for
    the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Scans and Pathology tests already up!
    -The one month wait to get Newstart and a cut of $48 a week for those poor sods aged 22-24yrs
    -The Looters still want to cut to cut paid parental leave to mothers. 80,000 families with
    new babies would be $11,800 a year worse off.
    -The Liberals increased taxes on wage earners for those earning $80,000( in the last budget)
    -The cutting of penalty rates for some of the lowest paid in our community by the Liberals
    -The changes to deeming have cost pensioners thousand of dollars per year myself included.
    Why has no one taking the deeming this up with Morrison?

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

PASSWORD RESET

LOG IN