Humble servant of the Nation

Who’s next in line to lead DPRK?

SHARE
, / 6019 63

North Korea’s Supreme Leader, 36-year-old Kim Jong-un, is reported to be clinging to life after undergoing cardiovascular surgery.

And people say there’s no good news in the world these days.

The report came from the Daily NK, a web-based news service in South Korea which tries to make sense of the byzantine comings and goings of the North Korean power elite. Jong-un’s absence was noted on April 15, the hermit country’s most important public holiday – Sun Day, the birthday of Jong-un’s dead grandpa, Kim Il-sung.

According to the Daily NK, Jong-un underwent surgery three days prior to the biggest propaganda exercise in the DPRK calendar where military parades and mass ritualised celebrations are the order of the day. Jong-un was nowhere to be seen.

The South Koreans don’t make a habit of commenting on matters on the other side of the DMZ, so it was unusual for a government spokesman to come forward in an attempt to scotch rumours that Jong-un was set to fall off the branch. Jong-un was believed to be, the South Korean spokesman said, “in another part of the country” and as far as they could tell nothing especially unusual was going on.

As with all matters North Korean, the answer is there somewhere stuck in a mire of misinformation and deliberate deceit.

Right or wrong, the news has been taken seriously enough for US intelligence and defence agencies to game scenarios of transitions to power in a post-Jong-un DPRK.

The DPRK is the ultimate family business. Should the grossly obese, chain-smoking, hamburger-scoffing five-star PlayStation general put his cue in the rack, the Kim dynasty will be short another Kim on an already short Kim list.

Jong-un’s oldest brother, Kim Jong-nam was assassinated at Kuala Lumpur International Airport three years ago. Jong-un’s only surviving brother, Kim Jong-chul, four years his senior, was overlooked for the title role. Jong-chul is a huge Eric Clapton fan, having been spotted at Clapton concerts throughout South East Asia in recent years. He is said to live a quiet life in Pyongyang and plays in a band. A rock and roll hippy leader of the Hermit Kingdom? I don’t think so.

There are two sisters. Daddy’s girl, 45-year-old, Kim Sol-song was routinely seen glad handing the military at Kim-Jong-il’s side when he was still in the vertical. While she continues to hold senior positions in the Korean Workers’ Party, she largely slipped from view with Jong-un’s ascendancy.

The youngest of the Kim Brady Bunch is Kim Yo-jong who possesses the sort of overtly sweet, cherubic face that could launch a thousand death camps. Various human rights agencies have described her as having committed serious human rights abuses. In brutality at least, she ticks a lot of Kim Dynasty boxes.

But Stalinists don’t do gender theory and the Confucianist background predominant in North Korea where deference to older males is the cultural norm, makes either Sol-song or Yo-jong’s rise to power unlikely.

Jong-un has three children of his own, but they are all a long way from adulthood.

Esoteric as the argument might be, the Kim Dynasty does not fit accepted theories of political science. The country is often described as Stalinist which it certainly was back in Kim Il-sung’s day, but the dynastic nature of transitions of power have more in common with militarist fascist rulers in Africa.

This brings to mind the recent squabbling over where Hitler and the Nazis appear on the political spectrum. The uninformed point to nomenclature, the party’s political name, the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, fixating on the second word but not the first and similarly ignoring the fact the Nazis fought pitched street battles with members of the German Communist Party all the way to Hitler seizing the Reichstag in 1933.

The real evidence comes from an analysis of the NSDAP’s performance in German elections. In 1928, the Nazis polled less than one per cent of the vote. By the 1930 election, they had 18 per cent of the vote almost all of it coming from the collapse of centre right parties, like the People’s Party and to an extent the Catholic Centre Party. The July 1932 election was the Nazi high watermark where it won 37 per cent of the vote (the election in November later that year would reduce Nazi support to 33 per cent) which occurred at the expense of moderate right and centrist parties most of whom splintered or disintegrated.

The right or left brouhaha is a pointless distraction. While the Nazis were certainly an extreme right-wing party, the real lesson of political science is what happens to an otherwise civilised democracy enduring times of great tumult when the centre all but disappears and extremism on the left and right is normalised.

The best description of Nazism is neither left or right but that it was a thug regime that relied on the economics of rolling conquest, transnational theft and mass murder to stay in power.

Both Nazism and the Kim Dynasty in North Korea highlight the limitations of a linear political spectrum. Extremes on the left and right have more in common than those who identify with the moderate centre.

Now in its third generation, the Kim Dynasty relies on continuity, from one Kim to another propagated on the propaganda lies of the dynasty’s supernatural powers.

If Jong-un dies soon, he will die without a clear successor. For the DPRK, the wall to wall, meat and drink propaganda will be harder to sell. The rise of a fourth member of the dynasty would appear to be unlikely, leaving the prospect of a massive power vacuum in a nuclear armed rogue state.

This column was first published at The Australian on 22 April 2020

63 Comments

  • Not Finished Yet says:

    Am I the only person who thinks he has a more than passing resemblance to Jabba the Hutt?

  • Trivalve says:

    As long as they keep rolling out that Valium-popping newsreader, I’ll be happy.

  • Dwight says:

    Right now I have to say I am disgusted with Twiggy Forrest. Using his presser today to promote the interests of China, over those of our country, is disgraceful. This could have been a masterstroke of his philanthropy, but he squibbed it, badly.

  • John L says:

    test — ignore

  • Carl on the Coast says:

    I see Xi’s ambassador in Canberra has apparently been instructed to tell us not to “play political games” re our pursuit for an international inquiry into the cause and spread of COVID19. Apparently the threat of trade bans was also mentioned.

    I trust the Morrison camp will let them know in no uncertain terms that we know how to grow our own rice.

    • Boa says:

      Goodness, the virus sweeping through the Newmarch aged care is pretty tragic. Eleven of them so far . How awful for the families .
      One senses a feeling of chafing at the bit to get the economy moving again before it is a basket case.
      Australia has done really well……so far.
      Down here Gutwein declares that we have to protect the elderly – and reminds us we have a large elderly population who we care about. But the younger set are beginning to question having to keep the restrictions going. “Why not just lock down the oldies and let us get on with life” sort of thing.
      Survival of the fittest. Pretty awful really.

      • Bella says:

        I’m interested to know why those residents of Newmarch Aged Care who tested positive were not transferred to a hospital with a ventilator. If I’m wrong I’m sorry but the news hasn’t been clear. I know if it was my mother I’d raise the roof to give her a fighting chance. So sad for the families involved.

  • Carl on the Coast says:

    Yes, has anyone mentioned Michael Moore’s recent docco – ‘Planet of the Humans’ ? Likely to get some chins wagging. But lefties will probably shun it like the covid (take your pick).

    • Dwight says:

      He’s saying that renewables are a joke and advocating population control (reduction?) instead. As you might expect, the neo-Malthusians are not going to off themselves to solve the problem.

      • Trivalve says:

        It’s a kind of form reversal for Mr Moore, isn’t it? I assume that there’s some truth in it, but what I like is (from the report I read because, no, I haven’t seen it) that he goes after green groups for their chronic duplicity. And I support that because – and I know it’s hard to get a message across if you don’t attract people’s attention – green groups are as dishonest as Big Oil, Pharma, Cotton, weedkiller or Big Whatever. Big Green talk bullshit too often and it irks me because I prefer facts to bullshit when we’re arguing about our future.

    • Dismayed says:

      Been withdrawn due to false information contained within. Plus he was being sarcastic.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

PASSWORD RESET

LOG IN