Humble servant of the Nation

Failures of church and state created monster Gerald Ridsdale

SHARE
, / 4689 51

Gerald Ridsdale, the former Ballarat priest has pleaded guilty to a further 20 offences against 11 victims and his conviction formally handed down.

On the basis of convictions, numbers of victims and number of offences, Ridsdale is the worst sex offender in this country’s history. While Ridsdale’s defence team laughably called for the prospect of parole, he must die in jail.

I read a copy of one man’s victim impact statement over the weekend. It made me weep. It was no surprise that, when he delivered it to the court yesterday, County Court Judge Irene Lawson also broke down in tears. The court adjourned briefly while the judge composed herself. In all ten of the 11 victims in this round of prosecutions provided statements, detailing lives in disarray, filled with emotional, lifelong pain, surviving rather than living.

Despite having their moments in court, the mystical, magical word ‘closure’ and all it connotes continues to elude them.

The obvious question is how did a pedophile priest, active for thirty years or more, with more than 60 victims having now come forward, escape justice for so long? Ridsdale had been offending against children from the moment he became a priest in 1962. He was first convicted of child sex offending in 1993.

The answer, in part, lies in the conduct of the Ballarat diocese under Bishop Mulkearns and his predecessor, Bishop James O’Collins. These senior figures within the Church, effectively the chief executive officers of the Ballarat diocese were aware of Ridsdale’s offending and merely shuffled him around the diocese to new parishes and new groups of children.

I could mount a very solid argument that the Ballarat diocese was a criminal organisation. Certainly it behaved as if it was, destroying evidence, perverting the course of justice, facilitating monstrous crimes, aiding and abetting the rape of children and then covering it up and moving the offending priests on when the protests from parishioners grew too loud.

The usual modus operandi of this sociopathic priest and others like him, was to prey on vulnerable children, kids battling emotionally with their families in distress due to marital breakdown, illness in the family or often when the parents or guardians were regarded as so devout they would never believe their children had they come forward and reported being raped by a priest.

In that respect, Ridsdale was a cold, calculating criminal. But by the time he was shanghaied to Mortlake in Victoria’s west in the early 1980s, he was out of control. He still stuck to his ruse of preying on especially vulnerable kids but his M.O. had started to change. He had begun raping kids spontaneously, opportunistically.

In the last day, we have also heard the incomprehensible and appalling crime of a father bringing his pre-teen aged daughter to Ridsdale and presenting her to the priest to be sexually assaulted.

Ridsdale’s actions were those of a man who did not fear consequence. He did not fear it because he had learned that he would not be held to account. The diocese would do nothing more than require his removal from one parish before moving him onto another. More significantly, he understood the police would do nothing.

This may be an old story to some but it needs to be repeated. In 1972 in Mildura a police detective, Denis Ryan sought to prosecute a paedophile priest, Monsignor John Day. Like Ridsdale, Day’s victims number in the hundreds. Day was protected by the most senior detective in Mildura, Detective Sergeant Jim Barritt. When Ryan sought assistance from senior Victoria Police, all hell broke loose. Ultimately Ryan had his career destroyed by senior police while Day was removed from the Mildura parish under the watchful eyes of the police and their co-conspirator, Bishop Ronald Mulkearns. He was let loose on another parish where he offended again.

Day was never charged and died unpunished in 1978.

Consider what lessons Ridsdale might have learned from this scandal. He and other paedophile priests in the diocese had effectively been given the green light. They could prey on children with impunity.

What lessons could be learned for victims? They learned the hard lesson that there was no point in coming forward. The fix was in. Is it any wonder under these circumstances that victims took on average more than two decades to report to police while many, many others will never come forward?

Members of VicPol understood precisely what had happened to Ryan. Many privately sympathised with him. But the lesson for them was, don’t open that disgraceful can of worms. It will cost you your job.

What we do know is the rate of offending escalated in the wake of the Mildura scandal. Ridsdale, who had been present in Mildura in the late 1960s and offended against children there, came to the view that he could rape children without ever being brought to book.

Consider, too, what might have happened had Day been charged and prosecuted in 1972 as he should have been. In this alternate universe, would paedophile priests like Ridsdale continue to prey on children, knowing a long jail sentence was coming their way? How would their boss, Bishop Mulkearns, have responded? The old cover up and move on strategy would have stopped there and then.

Of course we will never know but it is an entirely reasonable conclusion to draw that literally hundreds of victims would have been spared the enduring trauma of child sexual abuse had police done their basic duty.

Did this collaboration between Church and VicPol end in 1972? I believe it did not and there is evidence today of reports from victims not being acted on, statements from victims made to police going missing and watered down prosecutions, where priests like Ridsdale faced lesser charges while the more serious offences were not pursued.

Some of these instances may involve investigative ineptitude, some where police failed to act out of fear for the consequences on their own careers. It is worth noting those senior police involved in the Day scandal, whose perverted sense of loyalty to the Church, contrary to the oath they had all taken to protect and serve the people of Victoria, continued to rise through the ranks in VicPol. One retired as an Assistant Commissioner, one the head of Homicide, another the head of the CIB.

Apologies have been issued to Ryan by Victoria Police and its failures quietly acknowledged. But VicPol to date has failed to apologise to victims arising out of the Day conspiracy and I believe it has failed to do so because it strikes at its essence. No police force can act without public confidence and there can be no greater blow to public confidence than the historical failure of police to protect the state’s most vulnerable members.

Sadly, the state’s dirty secrets have been flung further into the shadows. What we can say is that without VicPol’s historical complicity with the Ballarat Diocese to suppress the investigation of clerical child sexual abuse, Ridsdale would not have become the monster he is today.

This column was published in The Australian 16 August 2017.

51 Comments

  • Henry Blofeld says:

    Shocker just in Mr Insider, looks like Deputy Leader of the Federal Nationals may be a Dual Citizen too, she might be Scottish! Strewth!

  • smoke says:

    Nash =dual citizen….JFC they’re hopeless

  • Wissendorf says:

    I regard ‘unsealing’ the confessional as a fundamental and urgent reform. I noted in a quick read of an article covering this reform that several leading Catholic clerics have indicated they would choose jail before they would do so. The church has learned nothing. We don’t tolerate Sharia Law. so why should we accept Canon Law? We jail parents who try to take their children abroad to be mutilated, but can’t compel a priest to reveal details of an abusing, raping cleric because of confessional sanctity? I suggest a star chamber arrangement where failure to disclose will lead to indefinite imprisonment. If anyone, in any capacity, chooses to side with the abusers, they are themselves abusers. Any organisation that permits or encourages clerics to adopt this course of action should be closed down immediately. I see no wriggle room here.

  • Mack the Knife says:

    “Hope it is never to be repeated. But it may be worth researching that the person in charge of the South Yorkshire child protection department that looked the other way while at least 1,400 children were forced in to sex slavery is now reportedly in charge of child protection services for……..Victoria.”

    Any truth in the above Jack? Comment from over the wall.

  • BASSMAN says:

    Mad Hanson Burkered in parliament.Crazy….for once Brandis has sed something worth listening to. Forget the TV weather 81 fahrenheit in our lounge room at Tweed…92 on the verandah and I came inside could not bear the heat.And there are Drongos who STILL deny the earth and oceans are warming. Sad Cafe

  • Boadicea says:

    Good to see Andrew Wilkie talking sense over the Joyce issue. Stop the juvenile behaviour and get on with governing until the High Court decision. I wonder if Bill was listening?
    Wilkie is my MP. Thank God I have someone to vote for next time around.

  • Boadicea says:

    Gotta say, the burqya suits Pauline. Could she be persuaded to wear it permanently?

  • Uncle Quentin says:

    Did the father ever face charges? Sad to think that the only penalty he would ever face if there was an afterlife…

  • Not Finished Yet says:

    I can’t help but wonder about the perpetrators and those who protected them. Do these people, career priests, actually believe in god? Do they really believe there actually is a hell, and if so, that they will avoid that as their fate? Do they, perhaps, believe in a god that is so indifferent to justice that a person who spends a lifetime raping children and destroying young lives can still expect to go to heaven? It’s all beyond my comprehension of theology.

  • Razor says:

    Great article Jack. You hit the nail on the head regarding police only deriving their authority by way of public consent. I imagine the activities of the clergy would probably have been an open secret amongst many at the time but due to the less than appropriate relationship between the man charged with protecting them and the offenders those people would have had nowhere to turn. The Detective Sergeant in a small country town in those days sat on the right hand of god.

    As to that word ‘closure’ I do not believe in the concept, particularly when it comes to victims of sexual abuse. They may be able to pull things together and achieve a life close to normality but the demon is always there. You simply cannot compensate that. Mind you the views of some on here regarding sending the Catholic Church broke does have significant appeal to me on a number of levels.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

PASSWORD RESET

LOG IN