Humble servant of the Nation

Australia’s end of innocence

SHARE
, / 10655 279

 

Sydney has joined many of the great cities in the world in having police on patrols armed with assault rifles.

The Colt M4 that will be issued to 100 officers from the NSW Public Order and Riot Squads is a combat weapon, with an effective range of 600m, firing up to 800 rounds per minute. Standard magazines hold 15 rounds.

At major sporting and cultural events, at railway stations, at places where people congregate en masse, the people of Sydney will soon become accustomed to the presence of heavily armed police.

The situation is similar to that throughout Europe, and Australian tourists have become accustomed to seeing armed troops and police on the streets.

There are arguments against, of course. The Metropolitan Police Service in London, once a group of baton twirling bobbies, armed with whistles who, when encountering a ne’er-do-well were obliged to say, “Stop or I’ll be forced to say stop again.” Now, of course, many are heavily armed with automatic long-arm weapons on patrols of London streets.

The detractors say this has not stopped terrorist events, but this is a failure to appreciate the extent of the terror threat facing the world and how to respond to it.

Full column here.

279 Comments

  • Boadicea says:

    Strange, Jack. Wandering the back streets of Paris recently I came across squads of about 6 heavily armed blokes here and there, camo uniform, flak jackets, machine guns at the ready sort of thing, and yet strolling along the rather vulnerable (one would have thought) banks iwf the Seine. not a cop in sight!!

  • Uncle Quentin says:

    I grew up in New Zealand where only special duties police were armed. After 28 years here I am still uncomfortable with the sight of police with shooters strapped to their belts. I think that the increase in the number of police with assault rifles is a necessary evil but it ain’t going to make me feel relaxed and comfortable.

    • Boadicea says:

      Actually I think I would feel a lot more comfortable, UQ. That’s the world we now live in I’m afraid.

    • Bella says:

      Nor me UQ.
      I have to say I hate guns, period, but police armed with loaded assault rifles on the streets in this country right now? What will that achieve aside from frightening the general public and very possibly inciting a radicalised terrorist to strike a nation living in a rising state of fear.
      If we pulled all our military out of the Middle East & immediately ceased
      dropping bombs on thousands of innocent civilians & incarcerated all those loony jihadists on the watch-list, we surely would reduce the threat our government seems hell-bent on reminding us of every waking minute. Over-kill will just up the ante.
      Lastly, we’ve all got the freedom to choose to go about our lives in peace as we always have without fear.
      If we can’t, then they’ve already succeeded.

      • Jean Baptiste says:

        Mind you Bella it is very important to keep the masses in fear, we’ll be constantly bombarded with the terrorist threat from now on. In the coming years it will be crucial to have in place draconian measures and a powerful police force to deal with a furious and rebellious population finally realising they have been shafted by the elites who will survive much longer, perhaps indefinitely after most of humanity perishes from starvation.
        Prior to that even those further up the totem pole will be infuriated as economic systems collapse and the value of their assets and security evaporate.
        The CIA was quite aware of this way back in the eighties when they proposed that climate change was the far greater threat to a stable world.
        It wont be many years before inflammatory words like these will be judged to be “terrorism” and punished severely.
        Revel in free speech while you can, it’s time is limited.

        So! Whop it up ’em. Make ’em take it.

      • Boadicea says:

        If only these lone wolf nutters felt the same way, Bella. Sadly, it appears not. I’ll go for the armed guards any day.

        • Dismayed says:

          Yvonne, just stay within your fearful four walls. The majority of people Do NOT want or believe armed personnel on streets is an improvement. Talk about siege mentality. You have already ceded to the crazies of all varieties.

    • Jean Baptiste says:

      Well UQ just as well you don’t live in Texas.

      https://www.google.com.au/#q=open+carry+texas+images&spf=1497056053971

    • Dwight says:

      As someone who used to go about armed, it’s not an issue for me. When I was home last year I was surprised (but shouldn’t have been) at the number of my family members carrying.

  • Tracy says:

    My last Christmas shopping expedition to Oxford street (87) before I came out here, military with various pieces of hardware and as usual no bins. We were used to the no bins and I can’t remember batting an eyelid over the military, we weren’t long past the Remembrance Day bombing in NI so I guess the authorities thought we were in for another round from the IRA.
    What a to do in the UK, Conservatives creaming the SNP in Scotland, thought the Scots would rather have teeth pulled and tiny majorities in some constituencies, may (scuse pun) be another Con/Lib dem partnership.

    • Jack The Insider says:

      It’s lovely chaos, Tracy. I can’t see how a government could be formed or why anyone would want to under the current circumstances. I think they’ll be back at the polls before the year is out.

      • Tracy says:

        Rather ironic Corbyn calling for May’s resignation, this is the same bloke that had his bum firmly welded to the opposition bench when his own party wanted him gone.
        My son said the Corbyn “victory” reminded him of the Shorten “victory” it saved their proverbial arse to fight another day, especially as their nearest and dearest parliamentary colleagues can’t get rid of them without a hell of a kerfuffle
        May has continuously run rings around him in parliament, but he was better on the campaign trail, all the same the electorate has dodged a bullet I’m surprised they even contemplated.

        • Jack The Insider says:

          Seems like she will stay on and battle along with minority govt. I can’t see it lasting and gee, there will be some knives out for her. Lynton Crosby also copping a pasting. Labour had a very good ground game, Corbyn was not much better than mediocre but May, well, there are no words for how badly she has performed.

          • Wissendorf says:

            Having a few with the mates and we think the word is – Clintonesque. That was from a Scottish gent after about 6 whiskeys. At least, I think that’s what he said.

          • Boadicea says:

            But she’s not conceding that, Jack. Tough old duck. Maybe that’s what they need. Be interesting to see who puts their hand up. The Brexit stuff will be even tougher now they know they’re dealing with a weakened Britain.

          • Penny. says:

            Lynton Crosby…or should that be Sir Lynton Crosby deserves copping a pasting. I had dealings with him during the Shane Stone era of NT Government and to say I was unimpressed with him and his dodgy political tactics would be an understatement

          • Dwight says:

            Wonder if those oracles gave May the same advice; “the base doesn’t matter”?

  • Milton says:

    Fancy, the old Rebels Human Resources Dept as world’s best practice. But stealing his bike (consider it an application fee) is just plain naughty.

  • Frank says:

    Welcome to Northern Ireland eh! Oh well, it only takes one prick to burst your bubble and your innocence is gone. Innocence will get you killed in acivil war. Innocence is overrated.

  • Wissendorf says:

    Only surprised this took so long. Are police permitted to carry their weapons while off duty? (I’m asking about their sidearms here). If not perhaps they should be required to carry them but out of sight. My suggestion would be to arm JPs with concealable weapons so we have a larger armed presence, and it is out of sight. Your suggestion of locking up anyone on a terror watch list is excellent. I can’t see why we haven’t looked at that already.

    • Jack The Insider says:

      Off duty, no.

      • Penny. says:

        Years ago, I went out with a policeman who came around for dinner one night and he was supposedly off-duty. He dropped his loaded gun….no let me rephrase that, he placed a gun that had been in a holster on his hip, on the table. When I asked if it was loaded, he assured me it was, but that I had nothing to worry about…ho,ho,ho. I stopped seeing him shortly after that, it gave me the heebie jeebies.

    • Trivalve says:

      I know a couple of JPs. No thanks. Also means there’d be a gun at every chemist maybe? Or we could all carry them like in Texas. Yee haa. Works well most of the time, as long as we all go to church too. And don’t mind the odd toddler shooting their mom.

  • Jean Baptiste says:

    Of no consequence but a mild disagreement happening around the coffee table today. Is it more correct English to refer to the term “Prince Harry” as an oxymoron or a misnomer? Anyone? Less polite suggestions should be kept to ones selves.

    • JackSprat says:

      Just an over-privileged moron will do.

      • Boadicea says:

        I think Harry is the most human of the lot of them. Rather hunky – although his thing with the movie starlet a bit off-putting.

        • Jean Baptiste says:

          Quite so! Could be a lack of proper inbreeding do you think?

        • JackSprat says:

          Ahh in every woman there is a little girl who dreams of being rescued by the handsome prince on his shiny white charger and whisked away to the fairy tale castle to live happily ever after.

          B. If his name was not Windsor he would be a very junior army officer.

          • Penny says:

            JS……not in this woman. Mind you if Prince William (who s now going bald I note) or Prince Henry/Harry had been around in my day it might have been different. All we had was Prince Charles….one could hardly call him handsome or even mildly interesting and attractive.
            One couldn’t compete with the delightfully charming Camilla anyway.

          • Boadicea says:

            True, JS!

    • Milton says:

      Neither is correct, Jean and I’m not sure that what you mentioned is technically a ‘term’. Was there anyone else besides you at the table?

      • Jean Baptiste says:

        Seven, but technically not all beside me. If you are not sure if it is a term technically , arguably it is depending on provenance , perhaps you could find out for me?
        What is correct then, technically, Milton?
        I wasn’t paying much attention myself but I assume the disagreement was around the idea that his name is Henry and not Harry. I cant think of any other reason for such coarse amused and energetic speculation. I am ashamed of my friends sometimes.
        Hardly proper for a Prince to be so misnomed by the seething unwashed masses tho is it? Has there been a King Harold since the Battle of Hastings?
        I have dug up a little research material which does not seem to give a clue but here it is for your perusal.
        You might notice something I have overlooked?

        https://www.google.com.au/search?q=prince+harry+compared+to+james+hewitt&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwii1Ork5rHUAhVTPrwKHTnNAFYQsAQIIw&biw=1314&bih=598

        Best wishes,
        And give them peasants heaps.

    • Bella says:

      Out of the whole privileged bunch I actually like Harry JB he comes across as pretty grounded considering. The guy is the public face of important charities like the Invictus Games & seems like a regular human being, more to his credit. I also like that he lets loose far more than his brother cos he won’t ever have to worry about being a king.
      Cheers, Bella

      • Jean Baptiste says:

        Agreed, as per my reply to Boady.
        Theoretically, and it is my sincere wish, he could become King.

        Give ’em heaps.

  • Jean Baptiste says:

    Need to keep a close watch on the criteria for placing someone on the watch list if it means mandatory and possibly indefinite slammer time.

    • Jack The Insider says:

      There is no national list, only groups that are being investigated or watched at some level by state, fed and intelligence levels. What info is shared is the big issue.

      • Jean Baptiste says:

        Absolutely, co-ordination.
        Good read btw, especially Monis getting the flick from the bikies. They must have been bitterly disappointed and betrayed to discover he didn’t have any money after representing himself as a promising prospect. Having his bike nicked wouldn’t have helped his mental state either.

    • Cyclops says:

      Wanna see how much google knows about you when you’re signed in? https://myactivity.google.com/myactivity
      And that’s just the stuff they tell you! Imagine aht the govt get access to

  • Trabvitch says:

    Liked your turn of phrase “the Rebels don’t “do” law enforcement” in the over the wall version!

    • Bella says:

      If the Rebels OMCG don’t “do” law enforcement, I would assume they don’t do much in the way of co-operation either. Seems they made an exception with Monis or Monis reported exactly how the theft went down to the cops. Either way law enforcement had to be well aware he was a loose cannon long before the siege.

      • Jack The Insider says:

        No, Bella. True to form they declined to cooperate but provided an account through an intermediary. As for the stolen bike, they knew nothing, of course.

  • Henry Blofeld says:

    Sadly, Mr Insider, we must accept this change to protect our Society although equally as sadly the Terrorists will most likely find a way around this new order of seeing armed Police etc on our streets, however imho sure beats doing nothing. Interestingly you say the Colt M4 can fire 800 rounds a minute yet the standard magazine holds only 15 rounds? A mere “blip” and you would be out of ammo surely?

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

PASSWORD RESET

LOG IN