Humble servant of the Nation

Smoke and mirrors: The big money behind Australia’s vaping ban

SHARE
, / 14375 114

With a new financial year underway, the Morrison government will request the Governor-General to prohibit the importation of e-cigarettes containing vaporiser nicotine and nicotine-containing refills for e-cigarettes unless on prescription from a doctor.

The G-G can hardly say no.

As of next Wednesday, importing nicotine as a liquid for vaping or in the form of e-cigarettes in one shape or another will be criminalised. It comes with a $220,000 fine.

Even if you ordered a supply of nicotine last week, it will be seized. Force majeur. No refunds payable.

Evan Mullholland, the Director of Communications at the Institute of Public Affairs tweeted yesterday, “I don’t smoke, but I know so many people who have kicked the habit of cigarettes by vaping. It is clearly a safer alternative. Greg Hunt is a decent Minister but as a Liberal Party member of over 10 years I have to say this is the most abhorrent decision I have seen in politics.”

Forget smokers. It’s the Commonwealth that has become gormlessly addicted to nicotine. Australian cigarettes are the most expensive in the world. A pack of 25 cigarettes at the bottom end costs around $32 or $1.25 a stick. Around 80 cents of that is kicked over to the Commonwealth.

The Commonwealth pocketed $12.15bn in tobacco excise last year. Budget estimates for the next financial year put the excise grab at $16.9bn and it is projected to stay around $16bn over the forward estimates.

That’s a lot of money. To give it a sense of scale it is just $6bn shy of total Commonwealth spending on Medicare and roughly a quarter of the Commonwealth health budget, paid by one eighth of the population.

A man exhaling smoke from an electronic cigarette. Picture: Eva Hambach/AFP
A man exhaling smoke from an electronic cigarette. Picture: Eva Hambach/AFP

Vaping is much cheaper than smoking, not least of all because those who have legitimately imported nicotine products pay no excise to the Commonwealth. It’s a matter of ordering online and paying for the goods, the postage and handling and paying whatever tax is in place in the country they are purchasing from.

The way the law is at present, it is illegal to sell nicotine in liquid form or e-cigarettes in every state and territory.

Vapers have had to turn to the internet and lawfully purchase those products from overseas, often from New Zealand or the United States.

Minister Hunt says that a vaper may continue to import nicotine provided they have a prescription from their GP, approval from the Health Department and have successfully applied for permits to import the product.

There are so many hoops to clamber through, even the most stubborn vapers will give up.

Smoking rates have reduced, but only marginally in the last three years, down from 12.8 per cent of the population 14 or older to 12.2 per cent. Much of that reduction comes from a sharp decline in smoking among the 15-24 age. The plain packaging advocates argue that it is a consequence of their policy but it is impossible to separate the implementation of plain packaging from the sharp, twice annual rises in excise and the rise of vaping.

We have very little data on vapers or users of e-cigarettes. That in itself is a poor reflection on health administrators in this country.

It is estimated there are around 300,000 vapers in the country. What we can only guess at is whether that number also smoke cigarettes, whether they vape as a means to an end of quitting smoking or whether they vape for the simple pleasure of inhaling nicotine and have no intention of quitting.

Similarly, there is very little data on the long-term harm that may come from vaping but a rule of thumb figure is smoking is around twenty times more dangerous. This is supported by the Royal College of Physicians in the UK which concluded, “the hazard to health arising from long-term vapour inhalation from the e-cigarettes available today is unlikely to exceed five per cent of the harm from smoking tobacco.”

Unlike vaping, smoking cigarettes includes the inhalation of known carcinogens in tar like butadiene, benzene, aldehydes, and ethylene oxide.

There is no evidence to indicate inhaling second-hand steam (rather than smoke) causes any harm.

What the new prohibition means is that vapers will turn to smoking cigarettes for their nicotine hits. They will turn from a relatively harmless method of consuming nicotine to a far more lethal form and the Commonwealth will be the beneficiary.

Why does the government with the public health industry, including the Australian Medical Association cheering them on, support the banning of nicotine for vaping if one of the clear outcomes will be a hike in cigarette smoking?

The only vaguely rational argument is that nicotine-based vaping or e-cigarettes might be a gateway to smoking, rather than the other way around. There is no evidence to support this. None whatsoever.

Indeed, what we can see is that the 15-24 age demographic has shunned smoking while many choose to vape. Vaping tends to be a young person’s caper. There’s no statistical evidence to indicate that by the time they hit 25 or 30 or 40, they hurl their vaping pods or e-cigarettes in the bin and light up a Marlboro.

It is more a case of people spending their hard-earned on a simple pleasure that comes with a certain risk but they carry on based on that much ignored principle of public policy, informed choice.

Vapers in older age groups tend to do so to get off the coffin nails. What are they going to do as of next Wednesday? Well, we know what they are going to do. They’re going to continue to consume nicotine in the only way available in the Australian marketplace: smoking.

Trust me these people have tried all the methods for quitting. Cold turkey, patches, chewing gums, sprays, tablets. They will need to receive doses of nicotine and the easiest way to do that is to stroll into a supermarket and buy a pack of smokes at the counter.

While the public health industry, those people who frown on the community for spending their money in pursuing the lawful pleasures of smoking, drinking and gambling, are stuck in an ideological warp, it’s difficult to believe the government has any other motive than a smash and grab exercise.

This article was first published at The Australian on 26 June, 2020.

NB: Several hours after it was published and under pressure from Coalition backbenchers, Health Minister Greg Hunt announced the ban on nicotine fluids and e-cigarettes would be postponed for six months.

114 Comments

  • The Bow-Legged Swantoon says:

    This is worth watching. I predicted that when this law was proposed it only had a 50-50 chance of being both passed by parliament AND upheld by the High Court. Let’s see what happens:

    https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/woman-stripped-of-australian-citizenship-over-alleged-isis-role-launches-bid-to-overturn-law/ar-BB15efMf?li=AAgfLCP&ocid=mailsignout

    • John L says:

      The legal profession have a vision of the world totally at odds with the majority and are prepared to go to great ends to achieve it.
      The woman does have a point in as much she was born here.
      I wonder who is picking up the legal costs in all of this.

      • The Bow-Legged Swantoon says:

        It’s impossible to know what’s going to happen. The fact of the woman being born here might make a difference considering that not long ago the Justices created a new type of person – the unlawful non-citizen indigenous permanent resident – on the basis of character deportees having Aboriginal ancestry. There’s a chance here to split citizens into two different streams; something the parliament has always resisted. Whether the court has the wit to avoid making a bigger mess of things remains to be seen.

        As an aside, I don’t support the law that made this possible. Initially I was inclined to but on reflection decided it was a big mistake. Adults accept the consequences of their decisions and mature countries should do the same. If we’ve made someone a citizen who subsequently becomes problematic we should be big enough to wear it. Simply washing our hands of them and dumping them on other countries to deal with is not a mature response.

  • wraith says:

    Oh and on topic, isnt it amazing what people will suck on?

    • Razor says:

      Often looked down and thought the same thing wraith!😉

    • John L says:

      Well at the moment we are all being told to suck it up Wraith so sucking on something might be a bit of a relief 🙂
      I have come to the conclusion that a lot of us are just suckers anyway

  • wraith says:

    Thought you had croaked, I havent been able to get your site to load since, the weekend you showed up on insiders.
    Figured you got on the sauce with the usual suspects, partied too hard and shuffled off….good to see its not true.

    • The Bow-Legged Swantoon says:

      Hey wraith. I passed on news of the blog problems to Eccles, Penny, Trivalve and Milton but didn’t have any other JtI crowd addresses. Glad you kept tabs.

  • Wissendorf says:

    Blues looking good Jack. The Cats at home was a good get. Blues had the knapp of the green and the Cats were coming but their bus came 2 points too late. Stewart Dew has the Suns firing, and Port on top; who’da thunk it. Tiges in an unexplainable position. Great to see the AFL back on their feet, though the legs are a bit shaky, a bit like Mundine after Horn. Has Gryzly surfaced at all this year?

  • John L says:

    Hi Jack
    We are in the “banning era”.
    If one individual objects, it gets banned.
    There is going to be some interesting adverse consequences resulting from the existing stupidity.

    • Razor says:

      You are now officially banned because you had the temerity to talk about banning John L.

      On a similar theme last weekend I dusted off my old copy of 1984. Haven’t read it since high school. Orwell was a genius he just got the dates wrong!

      • John L says:

        Ah, but it is for the common good and your own protection.
        I was trying to come up with some smart Newspeak for banning but that was the best I could do.
        I guess the Ministry for Banning would actually be spreading fake news.
        Funny how many things in 1984 has come to pass. Cameras in all the rooms (PC’s), microphones in all the rooms (smart houses) are just two.
        I might dig it up – the local library is sure to have a copy.

      • Dwight says:

        Yes, but we read it as cautionary tale. The current folks are looking at it as a DIY manual.

  • The Bow-Legged Swantoon says:

    These things are rarely the sole decision of the responsible minister so we can’t pin the blame completely on Greg Hunt but given his tendency to fussy-britches micro-management of everything he goes near I can’t imagine he would have been arguing too hard against it. He seems to become a captive of every bureaucracy that finds itself lucky enough to have him in charge.

    Once upon a time I would have said this sort of thing would have sat more naturally with those on the left but given you couldn’t slip a Tally-ho between the Liberals and Labor these days it would be unfair.

    Hope everyone remains safe and well.

  • Bella says:

    This is just dumb. Friends of mine took up vaping years ago to get off their ciggie habit & it worked for all of them. I know the government says that they could also cause health problems but one of these people has gone from being breathless to fitness running! I don’t know if the product has a use-by date but there will be a rush on ordering big-time.
    Why does this government consistently push to remove our personal choices? $$$?

    • The Bow-Legged Swantoon says:

      Indeed. They need to get out the old dictionary and look up the word “liberal”.

    • John L says:

      Not only this Government Bella – it seems to be anybody who gets elected these days.
      Try walking your dog along a beach in our area as an example. We have 10’s of kilometres of beaches.
      Try getting a DA through council – unless you are putting up a multi storey residential block with dodgy cladding.
      It might change now as, up to 6 months ago, many were at the top of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.
      After Covid most of us will be near the bottom.

  • Razor says:

    Every person I have ever met in the public health lobby are zealots. Not a pragmatic bone in their body. They only deal in absolutes.

  • Boa says:

    Well, hello again all.
    Time to get the blogging boots on!
    It’s good to see you back, Jack – hope everyone’s postcode is okay!! That is going to open a can of worms for sure – very difficult to police one would think.
    And if you land up in quarantine please don’t smoke or sleep with the security guard!

    • Jack The Insider says:

      Hey, Boa. Just had a chat to my old Mum in Melbourne. She is not in a hot postcode so going about her life normally. Hopefully they jump on this and there is no further spread.

      • Boa says:

        Gosh, let’s hope so, Jack. My daughter is also in safe postcode – for now at least. This virus is scary and it gets me wondering this morning if Australia’s fantastic effort to keep numbers so low is going to prove to be not so fantastic longterm – as not many are immune to it. Unless of course, an effective vaccine arrives on the scene.
        At last some flights are being listed from Hobart – although my trip to Uluru in Sept (3rd attempt!) is looking bleak as I have to pass through Tullamrine – which is a bad postcode at the moment. So I have optimistically booled a trip to Stradbroke Island in October. Surely it will be okay by then!! I need to get out of Tassie for some warmth and sunshine.

    • Bella says:

      Hi Boa, Hi JTI & all. 🐋
      Just when I thought Anastasia was holding her ground here in QLD, she’s caved in under relentless pressure from the blowhards in government. No backstabbing directed at SA or Tassie for closed borders but wait….they’re Liberal states right??
      Very impressive Premiers in Dan Andrew’s & Mark McGowan during this pandemic. Proud of them.👍

      • John L says:

        I would leave Andrews out of that list Bella.
        His whole world changed when the BLM march went ahead – at that stage the average Joe saw double standards being applied – like I cannot fish but that bunch can march – I cannot sit on the grass but that bunch can refuse testing – the double standards were everywhere.
        Social distancing went out of the window .
        On top of that he left the security of the quarantine hotels to a bunch of security companies without any government supervision and left 30% out of quarantine without testing. This has released the virus big time and he is trying to wriggle out from under with a judicial enquiry.
        I would not be surprised if Victoria is in total lockdown with a week.
        I doubt if NSW will be able to confine it to Vic.
        So SA, TAS, QLD,WA and NT will keep their borders closed and the economic consequences, already serious, will be far worse.
        All because Andrews did not follow the advice and use police for his quarantine hotels.
        I doubt if he will be able to talk his way out of this one.
        If I sound pissed off with Vic and Andrews, I am – they have undone months of painstaking and very expensive lockdowns that have put many many businesses on the brink of failure .
        Another lockdown will see many go to the wall.
        So please, do not put that clown Andrews on a pedestal.

        • Trivalve says:

          Morrison doesn’t agree with you JL.

        • Bella says:

          With respect my pedestal is packed full of greenies, ‘leftists’ & countless champions who devote their lives to saving wildlife & underdogs in an unjust world & that will never change.

          Dan Andrews has been vilified for months for making tough calls to stay the course & keep Victorians safe. It’s not his fault if families & the infected selfishly got complacent nor is he responsible if the largest security company let Victorians down. Leave it to the right-wing media to manufacture nonsense poll numbers when the truth is the opposite. The Lib bullies have used Andrews for political smears & it’s childish & harmful. They hounded him to open up for $$$$ because they stopped giving a rats about saving any more lives.

          If the BLM protest marches were responsible for a spike in Covid19 cases in Victoria why were there no new cases in WA, SA & NT? Brisbane & Stdney had massive numbers of participants but no new cases stemmed from that.
          Go after the left all you want but my question is when will this government, under Morrison, ever be held accountable for their secret unprincipled Sportsrorts scandal & the deaths by suicide they caused under Robodebt?

          • John L says:

            Hi Wraith
            I am not attacking the left because they are left – I am attacking because they have stuffed up big time and it could affect me personally big time in the future.
            I do not think he was vilified in the press Wraith – he was the pin up boy of the National Cabinet.
            However, he is responsible for the total incompetence shown in the quarantine debacle.
            His government has known for weeks that there was lax security at the hotels.
            His government has adopted quotas whereby competence and excellence is not the only criteria for promotion in the public service.
            He was advised by all and sundry not to use private contractors
            His state’s organisation for emergencies is shambolic.
            He is trying to divert attention by a judicial enquiry.
            I think his shambolic, debt ridden, union dominated government in Victoria is about to become unstuck but there is no alternative.
            As to the Sportsrort – no worse than what every party has done in the past. I cannot see any difference in the pollies from either party allocating this money as opposed to the Public Service. In many cases the Pollies might do a better job because they are closer to the problems. If our local mega council is any indication of the quality of the decision making, I would leave it up to the pollies every time.
            Robodebt – typical of all governments these days where it is impossible to admit a mistake but heads should roll because it was a disgusting , not only from the recipients point of view, but from a systems point of view.
            As to the marches:
            Discount SA,QLD and SA because at the time they were on top of Covid.
            NSW? There was a brief period when the pollies were saying things about the right to march but quickly changed their tune. It was a Supreme Court decision to allow it and they wore it.
            VIC? One always got the feeling that those in control condoned it.

          • Razor says:

            Bella I think the record now shows the Andrews government made a diabolical mistake. Who would have thought the socialists turned to private enterprise and got nailed!

            • Bella says:

              I don’t understand what you refer to Razor. If the point is about the security guards how is their disgusting conduct Andrew’s fault?

              • Razor says:

                All will be revealed Bella just keep watching…..Your man Dan is in diabolical trouble.

                • Bella says:

                  If that’s true then tell my exactly why Berajiklian & her dodgy so called border protections hasn’t seen them sacked over the Ruby Princess fiasco? Seriously mate blind freddy knows she’s nothing but a performing puppet for Morrisons failure to stop infected passengers disembarking. You do seem to know what the cops/guards know Razor, so just how many Hillsong cultists on board were given a free pass that fateful day? So sick of Andrews copping the blame. Haven’t we got to see a bigger picture now & focus on saving the lives of our beloved elders before it’s too late?
                  Murdochs Australian only encourages haters with far right agendas & it must be stopped.

  • Dwight says:

    I have one e-cigar sitting on the kitchen counter. I started using them when the uni decided the only place we could smoke was the middle of the rugby oval (slight exaggeration). Guess I’d better get a few more before the six months expires.

    It truly is a dumb decision. But, like with pokies it’s the government that has the addiction, not the people.

    • Jack The Insider says:

      WB, Dwight. Now that it has been postponed, it needs to be jumped on once and for all. Really dumb stuff.

    • Boa says:

      Hi Dwight. Never been a smoker so can’t add anything useful. But just saying hello 🙂

      • Dwight says:

        Hey Boa! Hope you’re keeping well. My stepson is in a safe Melbourne postcode–for now–I’ll bet his Mum has been nagging him though.

        As for the weather, up here in FNQ it can’t decide if it wants to be raining or sunny. I must be acclimated as it is 22 and I’m wearing tracky daks.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

PASSWORD RESET

LOG IN